Contributed by Anthony J. Demetris, M.D.
PATIENT HISTORY:

Per referral report, the patient is a 49 year-old female who was transplanted in 1992. The diagnosis was cirrhosis secondary to autoimmune hepatitis with a suspicion of variant PBC. Review of outside material.


Final Diagnosis (Case 43)

PART 1: LIVER ALLOGRAFT, NEEDLE BIOPSY -
  1. MILD TO MODERATE ACUTE REJECTION WITH PROMINENT CENTRAL VENULITIS(RAI=3/9).
  2. HEPATITIS B VIRUS INFECTION WITH NUMEROUS GROUND GLASS HEPATOCYTES.
    1. MINIMAL VIRAL ASSOCIATED NECROINFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY.

PART 2: LIVER ALLOGRAFT, NEEDLE BIOPSY -

  1. TREATED ACUTE CELLULAR REJECTION; GREATLY IMPROVED IN COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS BIOPSY (RAI=0/9).
  2. HEPATITIS B VIRUS INFECTION WITH MINIMAL VIRAL ASSOCIATED NECROINFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY.
  3. PERIPORTAL HEPATOCELLULAR SWELLING, INDICATIVE OF RECENT HIGH DOSE CORTICO-STEROID THERAPY.

PART 3: LIVER ALLOGRAFT, NEEDLE BIOPSY -

  1. MILD ACUTE CELLULAR REJECTION, WITH PROMINENT CENTRAL VENULITIS (RAI=3/9) AND MILD PERIVENULAR FIBROSIS.
  2. MILD INTERFACE ACTIVITY SUGGESTIVE OF A LESSER COMPONENT OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS (See microscopic description).
  3. HEPATITIS B VIRAL INFECTION (See microscopic description).

Previous Biopsies on this Patient:
None

TPIS Related Resources:
Liver Allograft Rejection Grading
Liver Transplant Topics


Gross Description - Case 43

The specimen consists of five (5) consult slides,Part 1, five (5) consult slides,Part2, and five (5) consult slides, Part 3, with accompanying surgical pathology reports.


Microscopic Description - Case 43

Their Part 1 (3 HE, 1 Hepatitis B surface antigen, 1 Hepatitis B core antigen).
The normal lobular architecture is distorted by centrilobular hepatocellular necrosis with dropout and perivenular inflammation consisting of lymphocytes, plasma cells and pigmented macrophages. The portal tracts are also minimally expanded secondary to a very mild focal inflammatory cell infiltrate.

Throughout the remainder of the lobule, there is minimal disarray but ground glass hepatocytes are easily recognized. Special stains for hepatitis B surface antigen are positive in a diffuse surface membrane expression as well as the classical intracytoplasmic inclusions. Stains for hepatitis B core antigen are negative with an appropriate positive control included.

Their Part 2 (3 H&E, 1 Hepatitis B core antigen, 1 Hepatitis B surface antigen)
The normal lobular architecture is intact and greater than 10 portal tracts are identified, mostly of which are free of inflammation. No bile duct damage nor loss are seen. There continues to be mild perivenular hepatocellular dropout, congestion and hemorrhage, but now only a minimal inflammatory cell infiltrate. Occasional pigmented macrophages are seen. Compared to the previous biopsy the centrilobular regions have greatly improved.

Ground glass hepatocytes continue to be easily recognized. In addition, there is periportal hepatocellular swelling, strongly suggestive of recent, high dose, corticosteroid therapy.

Stains for hepatitis B surface antigen are positive in a cytoplasmic inclusion and diffuse surface membrane pattern. Stains for hepatitis B core antigen continue to be negative with an appropriate positive control.

Their Part 3 (3 HE, 1 Hepatitis B core antigen, 1 Hepatitis B surface antigen)
The normal lobular architecture is distorted because of mild portal expansion and mild to moderate perivenular hepatocellular dropout, mild fibrosis, congestion and inflammation. In fact, the perivenular changes are predominant.

A few of the portal tracts show a mild mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrate and focal ductular reactivity. Mild focal interface activity is appreciated. However, the most striking changes are in the lobule, predominantly in the perivenular regions which show the changes mentioned above. In addition, there continuous to be numerous ground glass hepatocytes identified.

Stains for hepatitis B core antigen continue to be negative with the appropriate positive control. Stains for hepatitis B surface antigen show a cytoplasmic inclusion pattern.

Overall, the histopathological changes suggest that more than one insult is contributing to the liver injury. However, the predominant process is central venulitis with perivenular hepatocellular dropout, congestion and focal fibrosis. In our opinion, this perivenular reaction represents an acute rejection reaction and will respond to increased immunosuppression.

There is however, very mild focal interface activity and mild portal expansion. This could be either related to a mild component of chronic viral hepatitis type B or recurrence of the autoimmune syndrome, as per clinical history. The latter is favored. The continued absence of hepatitis B core antigen staining in the biopsy suggests a non-replicative form of the virus. This may be related to antiviral chemotherapy and/or integration of the viral genome and defective viral replication. Nevertheless, the rejection reaction is predominant at this time. I look forward to any follow-up in this case.


Please mail comments, corrections or suggestions to the TPIS administration at the UPMC.