Revised Standardized Cardiac Biopsy Grading System (2004) go to: Acute Cellular Rejection, Humoral Rejection, Ischemic Injury, Quilty Effect, Miscellaneous, Technical Requirements, Reference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACUTE CELLULAR REJECTION (go to top) | |||||
Grade | Synonym | Equivalent 1990 Grade | Histology | Comment | |
0 R(evised) | No acute cellular rejection | 0 | No mononuclear inflammation or myocyte damage | ||
1 R | Mild/low grade acute cellular rejection | 1A, 1B, or 2 | Perivascular and/or interstitial mononuclear inflammation; may have one focus of associated myocyte damage | ||
2 R | Moderate/intermediate grade acute cellular rejection | 3A | Perivascular and/or interstitial mononuclear inflammation;two or more foci of associated myocyte damage; may involve one or more biopsy fragments | ||
3 R | Severe/high grade acute cellular rejection | 3B or 4 | Diffuse mononuclear and/or mixed inflammation involving multiple biopsy fragments with multiple areas of myocyte damage; may have edema, hemorrhage and/or vasculitis | ||
| ACUTE ANTIBODY-MEDIATED (HUMORAL) REJECTION (go to top) | |||||
Grade | Synonym | Equivalent 1990 Grade | Histology | Comment | |
AMR 0 | Negative for acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) | No changes | |||
AMR 1 | Positive for acute antibodyAMR OR Histologic features of AMR OR positive immunostain for AMR (i.e., CD68. C4d) | Humoral rejection | Any combination of: capillary endothelial cell swelling, intracapillary macrophage accumulation, interstitial edema, hemorrhage, intracapillary and/or pericapillary neutrophils, intravascular thrombi, myocyte necrosis | These histologic findings and/or onset of hemodynamic compromise suggest follow-up immunostain for complement (C3d, C4d and/or C1q in capillaries) and immunoglobulin on frozen sections,complement (C4d in capillaries) on paraffin section and CD68 stain for macrophages within (CD31, CD34-positive) capillaries | |
| ISCHEMIC INJURY (go to top) | |||||
Grade | Synonym | Equivalent 1990 Grade | Histology | Comment | |
Early ischemic injury | Ischemia within first 6 post transplant weeks | Ischemic injury A (up to 3 posttransplant weeks) and some B (late ischemia) | Myocyte injury, myocyte vacuolization, fat necrosis, mixed inflammation including neutrophils, mononuclear cells and eosinophils | Myocyte injury is usually greater than degree of inflammation, in contrast to acute rejection in which inflammation usually predominates; with neutrophils should also consider possibility of humoral rejection component | |
Late ischemic injury | Ischemia related to allograft coronary artery disease | Ischemic injury B (late ischemia) | Secondary myocyte changes such as myocyte vacuolization and microinfarcts | Relevant vessels are typically not sampled on endomyocardial biopsy | |
| QUILTY EFFECT (go to top) | |||||
Grade | Synonym | Equivalent 1990 grade | Histology | Comment | |
Quilty effect | Quilty A OR Quilty B | Nodular or endocardial mononuclear infiltrate which may or may not extend into underlying myocardium | Infiltrating form of Quilty effect must be distinguished from acute rejection. Additional sections, or prominent vascularity, presence of lymphocytes and plasma cells, background fibrosis favor Quilty effect | ||
| OTHER (go to top) | |||||
Infections | Cytomegalovirus and Toxoplasma may both be associated with lymphocyte predominant inflammation, and must be distinguished from acute cellular rejection | ||||
PTLD | Although rare in the cardiac allograft, this requires constant vigilance | ||||
| TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT BIOPSY (go to top) | |||||
Variable | Minimum number | Comment | |||
Number of biopsy samples | 3 | Samples should not be divided once obtained; an evaluable piece of tissue contains at least 50% myocardium | |||
Number of hematoxylin and eosin slides | 3 | Additional blank slides may be useful for future studies | |||
Number of levels | 3 | ||||
Number of "routine" special stains | 0 | Trichrome stain may be helpful in selected cases for evaluation of fibrosis and/or myocyte damage | |||
Reference: Stewart S et al., Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1710-20. | |||||
| Home | | | Contact | | | Statement of Purpose |
Last updated: Tuesday, 21-Feb-2006 17:14:08 EST
Copyright © 1996-2006 University of Pittsburgh, unless otherwise specified. All rights reserved. Unauthorized redistribution prohibited.